>>2155347
Tracked and wheeled vehicles are fundamentally different units that really shouldn't be compared to each other directly. Strykers are not BMP-3 equivalents.
Even in your own post you are listing like four upsides to the Stryker and giving it "no anti-vehicle DPS other than its fucking top attack ATGM" as a downside. You also chose to give it the AGL over the .50 which can damage against light vehicles up close better than you'd think. Will your loadout die in a point blank IFV fight? Yes, because you took a loadout not meant to do that and then pumped its price with upgrades that don't help in there.

Up-armored BTR-82A and a base Dragoon Stryker are probably the most direct comparison you can get between RU and US wheeled IFVs and they're pretty even, if not US sided. BTR get 2 health and a bit of ERA, but only really enough to cover it against grenade launchers and HE rockets/shells; even AT4s will ignore it. Stryker gets a more accurate gun that also has more KE pen, which lets it pen tank side armor. Valuable on a fast unit. Also, notably, there's room to uparmor the Stryker from this comparison.
I've been using NGSWs in Dragoon Strykers quite a bit since the update and it makes for a very good pairing that is at least somewhat effective against essentially all threats. Russia really doesn't have an equivalent to that which I'm aware of, and it's an amazing breakthrough unit.
>>2155359
That's a fucking recon IFV you lunatic. It's a stealthy, fast, self-spotting ATGM carrier.