>>11380830
The fashion for user-friendly technology blurred most of the old gender-roles by making computers and the internet open to people with no STEM knowledge, so anyone can play at being a businesswoman with her power-suit and laptop running Microsoft Office. ML actually takes us back, because it makes all that stuff so user-friendly it doesn't even require a human operator anymore. The information economy that opened to women in the last half-century or so will therefore disappear.
The future for most women is the service economy. Even "learn to code" won't be an option for much longer, since hard-coding will be replaced by AI and human programmers will instead be dealing with software architecture, data science and pure mathematics. Few women exceed in these areas, and those who do usually do very derivative work, so you should expect to see them become subservient assistants to male engineers - just like it was in the old days.
>>11366415
>seems like "me too" is over as well
For the capital owners this is quite simple game theory. If you support #MeToo (and social justice causes in general) you have to spend more money on policy enforcement and content moderation, for which you receive public support and customer loyalty from about half the population. If you support the opposite (#MAGA, free speech, etc) you can actually spend LESS money and get support and loyalty from the other half of the population. So the public support you get is the same either way, but only one side requires you to spend money.
The only way the not-woke side can mess this up is by demanding their own censorship (e.g. christians against pr0n or something). As long as the right-wing pro-censorship groups remain marginal, the obvious choice will be performative non-wokeness. Hence Zuck, Jeff and all the tech giants lining up to kiss the Trump ring.