>>718895579
>>718895452
Well, at least I don't follow in the context of this referring to the pole/box question, but in the case of the bullet question, it's not the same, because you would be suggesting that as the bullet traveled through the doorway, at that very point, the room began to move around the bullet at the same speed, therefore meaning the bullet retained it's speed but then the world moved, which is even more absurd than the hypothetical question of portals and the answer being B., which brings me back to the problem of the room being stationary, sharing both portals, and how you would reconcile that with no increase in speed and a reason for the continuation of movement.
I ask these questions, firstly for an answer and to see how people respond, but also because I am curious who is or is not computing some important detail here, if the people that would answer A. aren't confronting the absurdity of the premise in their attempt to answer.
>>718895729
I will try, but it's more or less the exact same as the box question, just with an object switch, and I think the usage of a pole over a box (to which the same logic must necesarilly apply), better illustrates in the mind my problem with the answer being A.
