>>17991139
>none of this information was consistent with the use of an ethnonym, and the case of Celtiberi was not even discovered by you, but by another schizophrenic anon
You again?
Why do people on this forum have to be so malicious and provocative? Is it just trolling, or is it something more personal? Isn't it possible to have a human discussion? I'm sorry, but I'm not that guy.
He>>17991178 uses tripcode and I don't. The only reason you keep accusing me of being him is because we simply talk about similar things, which is dangerous because it could be a sign of persecution mania. Anyway, people can use photos, information, links, arguments, and whatever they want, whether from my own or anyone else's. Do you know why? It's an anonymous forum, and at no time did I have copyright over anything. You're welcome to use "my" discoveries.

And I ask the same thing I asked in the other thread;
present well-founded and corroborated objections as to why the cognate found in Galician is not plausible as "h2er." The argument arar/plow has been explained, including by Koch, who you conveniently cited as refuting it. Everyone can access the thread.