>>8713329
Hard disagree, I see it as the natural "devolution" of a series that got too popular and now the higher ups wants to appeal to a larger base to hunt whales at the expense of story. If I wanted the scenario you're talking about, I would be relatively fine with how TABA handled it over what the hell RPGX is doing, maybe tweak a few things like removing Fuuma. But literally none of the characters are recognizable anymore. But this is a subjectively fine disagreement to have.

>>8713353
>The thing you didn't just make a statement or simply disagree with me; you insulted me without even explaining yourself
No, I did make a statement, I just didn't explain it. Nor did I insult you, I aimed directly at your statement, not you personally. It's not like I called "you" trash, I said that take was trash.

The problem I had with your take is that it feels like you seem to think that Taimanin being a porn franchise = its not taking itself seriously, when it did relatively speaking. We seem to have vastly different value systems because you're ok with Redo because its "not trying to be porn" Are we even sure about that? Redo was pure revenge rape porn through and through. Just because it didn't.. nay, "couldn't" show pixels doesn't make it less porn in my eyes. It was clearly far pass the level of "ecchi." Redo is just porn filtered by the lowest bar possible, which makes it worst for multiple reasons. But Redo "not being porn" still doesn't make it better than Taimanin, because Taimanin DOES have those things you claim you like I.E A person to root for. If you just mean one is worst because one is porn and the other is not.. sure, I think that's a bit of an odd distinction.. but sure I guess.. But even by those metrics one is significantly less cringe than the other.
Or if you mean Taimanin having more content in this regard because its a bigger series means its "worst".. again, sure? But using the word "worst" is an odd choice of words for that descriptor.