>>938967613
The rebuttal mischaracterizes the thesis. At no point has the claim been that homosexuality proves extraterrestrials, or vice versa. Rather, the argument is methodological: when persistent anomalies recur across history, geography, and instrumentation, science is obliged to take notice. This is true whether the anomaly in question is a luminous object darting across restricted airspace or two men locking eyes across a crowded discotheque.

Like the Navy’s 2004 Tic Tac encounter, homosexuality is a multi-sensor phenomenon. Visual: the glance, the gesture, the impeccably tailored shirt. Infrared: the body heat signature that exceeds expected baselines in close proximity. Radar: the sudden “ping” of recognition when one gay man enters another’s detection radius at a brunch. Multiple independent sensors, converging on the same inexplicable signal, cannot be dismissed as anecdote.

Historical reinforces this. Just as cave art in Val Camonica depicts disc-like objects, so too do ancient Greek texts record enduring same-sex bonds. Across millennia and cultures, we find the same trace evidence: impressions in the social soil, burn marks on the fabric of heteronormativity, electromagnetic anomalies in the form of Broadway show tunes. These are not isolated events but a global dataset of multi-sensor queer presence.

Skeptics argue such observations are coincidence. But as Project Blue Book (1952) and Fabulous Studies Quarterly (Vol. 9, Issue 4) both concluded, coincidence cannot account for repeated, independently verified anomalies. The probability that radar, infrared, and visual gaydar all misfire simultaneously across cultures is vanishingly small (p < 0.0001).

Just as neutrinos and pulsars were anomalies before science caught up, homosexuality represents a phenomenon too multi-sensor to ignore. To deny the data is not scientific rigor but ideological blindness. Whether extraterrestrial or homosexual, the anomalies persist—and the sensors are unanimous.