>>512661565
They're not. They have just been studying more and studying better for the last 40 or so years. No one in the 1950s thought Asians were smart.

>>512449991
>outsmarted

>>509390369
1. no they're not, poor boy
2. the entire modern world originates from British ingenuity and innovation via the Industrial Revolution. Brits were traveling by rail, communicating by telegraph, curing smallpox and mass producing exports via machine while meds were still carrying water in jugs from rivers to their malaria-infested mud huts.

>>507924259
Whatever it is, it's not enough for their size and numbers.

>>507440960
Without Anglos we'd all still be living in mud huts while French-speaking Kings laughed in garlic breath at us from their perfumed halls.
Anglos spearheaded the Industrial Revolution because other peoples were too stupid to figure out steam power. British Empire made the world its bitch before, in the words of Kipling, the Anglo-founded USA "took up the white man's burden" of running the planet.
Anglos made America. Catholics made Mexico and Bolivia.