Search - 4rchive

>>41437771
>I ask you to clarify your own reasoning regarding your response with links to articles and zero articulation. Thus, challenging your ability to comprehend your own findings and provide reasoning that supports your claims other than "this article said so". (If we want to tie this into "high-school debate skill" - it's me asking you to defend your position, which is a simple thing to do)
>retard shill doubles down on exactly what I accused him of
>completely irrelevant to how air traffic controllers get paid
You talk like a pole-smoking fag at Eglin.

Let's try this again:
WHAT AMOUNT OF MY REASONING HAS ANY BEARING ON HOW THE SYSTEM WORKS?
Answer or shut the fuck up.

And the image? That took deep, non-AI analysis of the Gemini photo from ~3 weeks ago. But you weren't paying attention to that thread. You were shilling somewhere else.