>>106578577
>GPL is software freedom for everyone and to ensure that freedom is held. Its to keep the software being free, even the derivatives that comes from it.
>GPL definition of "free" is to ensure the software is free forever.
GPL is a set of restrictions pretending to be freedom.

>It is not the philosophical definition of freedom.
Its obvious because this world is not an ideal one, but a flawed one. People can, and will, exploit (((them))).
Restrictions on usage/distribution/etc are not freedom. They are antithetical to freedom.

>If you were to make a free software, and want it to keep being free/corps cant simply build upon your code, then you will use GPL.
I don't care if a corporation builds upon my code and have no desire to restrict this freedom. I believe in actual freedom, not GPL's crabs-in-a-bucket nonsensical reframing of freedom where somehow I have been violated if someone else finds success with something I publicly released.

>If you dont care, and love getting cucked, public domain and/or MIT
This is a gross and idiotic thing to say, and you said it because you are a gross idiot.