>>718012484
>I'm *mostly* with you. However, as an American, I have more of a civic perspective to nationalism. But I still understand that a shared identity is important. Without that, you have division. And we don't want division. I just think that distinctions are important. And when you try to throw distinctions away, because you feel like you're under attack, you're actually making your situation worse. Because the people who might be sympathetic to your plight, will witness how you are no longer making those important distinctions, and they will find that behavior repugnant.
This all sounds like it makes sense and like something I would agree with, but I'm not really sure what you are saying. You say "however" but then say something that almost sounds like (albeit vague) my view.
>By technicality, her origin is Scotland. You could say it's her nationality. While her ethnicity is not of Scotland. Or if you don't even want to give her the label of "Scotland national", then find another way to understand that she physically exists in Scotland. Because that's just objective reality.(again, fictional character, blah blah)
Yes but at this point it now seems like arguing semantics. It's not really relevant to my point.