>>513526554
Let me explain.

>>513525948 is correct, in the fact that it cannot trump Austrian law. We have them here in the UK, they are an arbitrary court for the willing members of the 'community'. This is allowable in common law countries, which includes the USA - They have these voluntary courts in their Amish communities.

Americans however deny there are Sharia courts in the USA but this is just lies, any area with a high enough groups of Mussies will have them.

London has the highest percentage of Mussies in Britain 15% . . . .Yet the USA has Muslim majority cities like Dearborn 60% Muslim and Hamtramck 55% Muslim . .. .are you telling me that those Sharia courts don't exist there? . . .of course they do.

It's a bit of a 'Judge Judy' court that only applies to the willing, it does not superseded the laws of the country it is based in.

Hope this helps?

>>510702892
>HERE ARE THE FACTS

I am on a rare visit to brit/pol/ but I avoid it like the plague, Why?:

Instead of discussing the many political problems that we have most of the conversations tend to revolve around the resident namefags; Particularly one involving someone whose name begins with 'J' ?

Yes - I understand that he has many sock puppet accounts that makes way for him to appear but FFS just IGNORE them and don't reply. brit/pol/ turns into a circle jerk and it's shit.

The same applies to namefags who you dislike.. . . .Don't fucking reply . . .is this rocket science?

Having said that, I'm all for a bit of banter but this thread and other threads are shite.

I'm all for the Mods sending this general to >>>/bant/

Rant over.

>>509129412
>Because you stupid GOYIM think OP pictel is a quirky accident
OPs pic is actually a fake.