>>60898590
I have blowout stakes in both so I'm not biased here.
> the technology is better
Sorry, friend. Even if this were true (it doesn't seem so), technological edge almost never, ever, ever matters. Ethereum was complete 100% dog shit engineering. Doesn't matter. They can patch it. If their competitors come up with a feature they can clone it. Technology is replicable, devs are fungible. Simply does not matter. First mover matters, things like that. You are out of your element here, for sure.
> LMFAO So your argument is that speculation will dominate?
You seem confused here. I'm here to tell (You) about a potential 100x. What do you think that's going to look like a priori? Many on this board already know. You can sputter about it, the great thing is this board is anon so you can make up your mind in private. I hope you make it Ripple Text Wall anon because I love your spirit.
> Once it is legal, why would [banks] pay others rent for a slower and more costly service?
I'm guessing you worked in neither tech nor finance. Do you know what banks love love love to do? Outsource literally everything they possibly can. Firms are not going to look at this and decide they want to build oracles. If they want a slice of it they will do what they always do...buy it.
> Price news
I recommend not reading price news
>>60898815
> Among other things, you are forgetting ...
RTWA, you seem to have researched this very well, and that's admirable. The problem is you simply do not have the experience or understanding. You are like a well-read intern showing up in D.C. thinking that qualifies him to be president. If you really cannot evaluate how your arguments are doing, you are stuck in the middle of the curve, and you do not have the capacity to make it.