Search results for "6e86dda1f4499a79f9b2893a95db897e" in md5 (4)

/lit/ - Theory of forms: Plato
Anonymous No.24602535
Theory of forms: Plato
Plato's theory is often seen as the philosophical basis for the enduring power of mathematics. The idea that a perfect, unchanging circle exists independently of any physical drawing is fundamental to geometry. The pursuit of perfect, universal laws in physics, chemistry, and other sciences echoes the quest for Plato's Forms. Scientists seek to discover the universal "blueprint" or "form" that governs a phenomenon, rather than just observing its messy, imperfect manifestations.

The concept of a perfect Form or ideal is the philosophical predecessor to modern standards in manufacturing and industry. When a company designs a product, it creates a perfect "Form" or blueprint. Every physical product manufactured is an attempt to replicate that ideal. Quality control is the process of comparing the physical product to the ideal form and discarding those that fall too far short. This applies to everything from mass-produced cars to computer chips.

Plato's idea of a non-physical, perfect "Form" is an abstract concept that is central to logic and computing. In logic, we deal with perfect, formal systems that are not tied to physical reality. A computer program is a set of logical instructions—a kind of "Form"—that governs the behavior of physical hardware. The code itself exists in a logical, non-physical realm, while the computer's operations are its physical, imperfect manifestation.
/lit/ - Thread 24554825
Anonymous No.24554825
What is even the point of studying Aristotle in this day and age? How can his metaphysics, ethics, etc. have any merit when they derive from his empirically false observation of physics?
/lit/ - Thread 24497638
Anonymous No.24497638
What does Aristotle mean by "substance" (ousia)? How does he distinguish between primary and secondary substances? Why are individual, concrete things (like "Socrates" or "this tree") considered primary substances, while species and genera ("human" or "animal") are secondary?
/sci/ - Thread 16697402
Anonymous No.16697402
When studying logic several materials/sources talk about a difference between arguments and explanations. However they all suck at explaining this difference. How come? Is this some modern shit perhaps?