>>520855425
Oh wow I had actually completely forgotten about this.

So you have people who just describe the phenomena of their action as opposites, but the problem is when you get to the people who just accept that in the way they're accepting it, what is ongoing, what's technically going on is a demonic possession, and this creates the context, if you have education as a cultural forefront, of just asking, well what's the opposite of that as a vague implied constant familiar.

So the interesting thing about this is that along the lines of general context here being about opposites.

How do you get a true opposite? And then, how do modern norms, the existence of chatGPT like personalities available for free with just an internet connection.

So this turns into a tokenized standard reaching the conclusion of growing up, ie: if you have aged you have both entry to the idea and a reflection of yourself that is still there and that still exists.

As you start to generalize tokenization, the subject becomes much more broad, and that's the fundamental thing that's also about political ideologies, ie: left vs right


TLDR

Opposites --> encapsulation in an algorithm doesn't make it topical

depending on how fast you individually notice the pattern the way you accept what's going on and what it technically means starts to cause you to run into yourself.


>what I have outlined here describes with relative accuracy paid for private interest equity.