>>3808
Also I should mention I think a lot of these issues would be solved by some strict guidelines and as I said earlier, just letting everything that doesn't fall under those rules slip by. Whether it's decided we ban /jp/, /tg/, /c/ and /e/ threads or not, there's a lot of janitor preference dictating janitor action, rather than just adhering to a set of rules. I'm not sure if this is fine and something I just have to get used to, maybe everyone is used to just going with their gut but there is going to be edge cases and in those cases I feel it'd be better if we left the topic alone rather than leave it up to janitor preference. I'll elaborate if anyone asks, but I feel that's one main thing stopping the report queue on /a/ from being a little cleaner.

So whether the changes go through or not, some sort of stricter (not necessarily meaning more deletions or bans, could in fact mean less depending on the route we take, just stricter meaning more concise) guidelines would be nice. If somebody tells me I should just know a shitpost when I see it I can try my best, but either mistakes will be made or inaction will be the result (some higher up determines something a shitpost and I won't remove it, or I remove something and a higher up determines it wasn't a shitpost, both seem like negative results to me). Would also be nice to say "If something doesn't fit within these guidelines, it's okay to clear", meaning a majority of posts which don't fall under those guidelines can be cleared without worry.

Also not sure if this is relevant to the current subject of debate, but I figured I'd throw it out there.