>>514877461
WMAF essentially just produces something resembling Finnish people as the final end product, provided you're breeding with Northeast Asians and not Southeast Asians. Just about every other kind of racemixing produces abhorrent abominations that make it pretty clear why you shouldn't do it. ( Castizas are fine for bleaching if you're gonna go the LATAM route) I consider Japs and Koreans honorary, I'm just not sure if their similarities to us comes down to actual genetic relatedness or just more of a convergent evolution type of thing where they developed similar psychological and spiritual qualities independently because they evolved in a very similar Northern Hemisphere environment. I understand most NatSocs being more absolutists about it and saying it's white or nothing, and that's a personal goal of mine at the moment, but I'm also a realist and realize that there simply isn't enough marriageable non kiked white women to go around. It might not be the worst thing in the world if some white guys who are fucked out of marriage and kids regardless fan out and bleach the world a little whiter. Not saying such couples should be allowed in the ethnostate, but maybe a certain portion of your gene pool is supposed to be out expanding the range of your gentic qualities. Pic related is mostly a joke but you can't really deny the math suggesting that it's better for men to racemix as explorers and conquerors than it is for women to do so as the conquered. The problem in western countries right now isn't racemixing per se, it's non whites being allowed in to out breed us. Maybe it really does just come down to a competition of how many wombs you can impregnate.

>>510266279
This. White women pretending to be NatSoc and their simps will forever seethe because white men racemixing just isn't as big of a deal and is better than white women mixing. Part of racial competition is breeding another race's genes out to colonize foreign populations with your DNA. So letting your women racemix is bad, but letting your men racemix under certain conditions is beneficial. If done as a conqueror or explorer, and done enough, you create a hybridized population that is potentially more racially loyal to the colonizers than the colonized. The difference can be seen in Latin America where you have advanced countries like Argentina that are more white and identity more with their European roots than say Venezuela where you have much more Indio DNA and thus much more anticolonial attitudes. There's a reason why the Germans where able to seek out the Argentinians as stable allies during and after the war beyond just the geopolitical factors. The biological differences between male and female roles in reproduction creates an unavoidable numbers game. Every nonwhite woman you impregnate denies a nonwhite man access to reproducing a fully nonwhite child. Should racemixing be done within an ethnostate? No, it should be done on foreign soil only, the idea is to spread white genes out, not bring nonwhite genes in. And if an ethnostate accepts mixed people and gives them white status on account of their father, their marital rights and access to benefits should be less than a completely white person.