>>513892026
4. Addressing Weaknesses and Logical Coherence
Critics argue the theory lacks direct proof, but intelligence operations are designed for deniability—assets like Epstein operate through cutouts (e.g., Wexner, Barak). Epstein’s 2019 “suicide” (with broken neck bones and sleeping guards) mirrors Robert Maxwell’s suspicious death, suggesting cleanup to protect handlers. Recent DOJ releases (e.g., no “client list” found) could be selective, as agencies control disclosures. The theory’s strength lies in its explanatory power: it accounts for Epstein’s wealth, access, leniency, and elite network better than alternatives like him being a lone predator.
In this steel-manned view, Epstein was a joint Mossad-CIA asset, his trafficking ring a tool for global blackmail to manipulate power structures. This isn’t fringe; it’s supported by investigative journalism (e.g., Whitney Webb’s “One Nation Under Blackmail”) and aligns with historical precedents like the CIA’s MKUltra or Mossad’s use of kompromat. If true, it exposes how intelligence agencies undermine democracy through moral corruption.