>>514188240
>what's the case?
Shhh! After its done... but when it comes to Pam Bondi, her looks are second tier to what I have to see each day though. D cups are quite lovely.

>>513051992
Hey anon, why are you afraid to answer my questions? Are you saying you are not able to call Trump a pedo because there is no evidence of such allegations? Be very clear here!

Politics?
>512601498
>regulars defending israel again...right on cue

>In “Fear and Loathing On The Campaign Trail ’72,” Hunter S. Thompson chronicled Senator George McGovern’s failed Presidential bid. In discussing McGovern’s distaste for ‘dirty politics’ that undermined his ability to hit back, Thompson regaled his readers with a famous story of Lyndon B.
>“This is one of the oldest and most effective tricks in politics. Every hack in the business has used it in times of trouble, and it has even been elevated to the level of political mythology in a story about one of Lyndon Johnson’s early campaigns in Texas.
>“The race was close and Johnson was getting worried. Finally he told his campaign manager to start a massive rumour campaign about his opponent’s life-long habit of enjoying carnal knowledge of his barnyard sows.
>“Christ, we can’t get away with calling him a pig-fucker,” the campaign manager protested. “Nobody’s going to believe a thing like that.”
>“I know,” Johnson replied. “But let’s make the sonofabitchh deny it.”
The gayper's shill strat is old and stale.

>Now where are the Epstein files?
if you know, you know

>“Trump protects pedos” is the best case scenario that MIGAtards are looking at. Just a hunch, but I don’t think he went to Billionaire Pedo Blackmail Island just for the scenery.
How is Trump protecting pedos/Epstein when:
1. he's fucking dead
2. the list and the names of others involved are already with and known to law enforcement
I know you are really fucking retarded and you can't imagine what your day would have been like yesterday if you didn't eat breakfast but for the love of God, I hope you reply with another retarded take.

>>509280580
I know one thing, they rely on substations.

The wikipedia editors really don't like our bunker busting bomb being successful: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:GBU-57A/B_MOP