>>34159276
>I'll probably not be able to do this much more in a couple of months anyway.
lol, nevermind months, I have a day. Guess the next thread will be my last.

>>34162808
>Tears for the commonwealth?
Yup, RIP if this turns out to be true, which is quite possible since the site doesn't seem to be able to handle the scale of what would be needed. Wouldn't surprise me if that result was hoped for by the UK gov in the first place. Canada might end up following.