>>106252439
>the fuck are you talking about, most of linux code is written by globohomos from scratch, tehere is barely any code left from pre-2000 era

The hackers created the organization and structure of the program that is the Linux kernel.

They still own that. The courts recognize said organization and structure as intellectual property.
You won't believe me in this: I do not care.

Your annotations and changes to the Linux Kernel, even if "no piece of pre 2000 code yet remains": are still derivative works of their copyrighted work. They also own the organization and structure of the code.

According to the Copyright Office they have the right to control derivative works of their copyrighted work. Which the hackers all retained their copyrights to (they did not transfer their copyrights)

>so? where are they now?
Exactly.
Nowhere.

You disrespect them and spit upon them.

>no globohomos were willing to support it, where were the freetards when we needed them to step up?
Banned, dipshit.
Also the code still worked fine. It didn't need support, dipshit.
Support was NEVER required when the hackers wrote ALL of linux from 1993-2003.
That is a new "requirement" and was never part of the deal.

You faggots removed ReiserFS because he is not a feminist.
He gave his money and his mind and his life to free software, and the hacker cause.
I remeber it. You removed his work to remove his legacy. ReiserFS made linux: it was nothing before that journaling FS was put in. And it was everything once it was in.

The hackers should rescind their permission to use their intellectual property.
And sink what you have stolen and locked them out of.
Which is their life's work.

Yes IAAL.

>>>/g/106252439
>the fuck are you talking about, most of linux code is written by globohomos from scratch, tehere is barely any code left from pre-2000 era

The hackers created the organization and structure of the program that is the Linux kernel.

They still own that. The courts recognize said organization and structure as intellectual property.
You won't believe me in this: I do not care.

Your annotations and changes to the Linux Kernel, even if "no piece of pre 2000 code yet remains": are still derivative works of their copyrighted work. They also own the organization and structure of the code.

According to the Copyright Office they have the right to control derivative works of their copyrighted work. Which the hackers all retained their copyrights to (they did not transfer their copyrights)

>so? where are they now?
Exactly.
Nowhere.

You disrespect them and spit upon them.

>no globohomos were willing to support it, where were the freetards when we needed them to step up?
Banned, dipshit.
Also the code still worked fine. It didn't need support, dipshit.
Support was NEVER required when the hackers wrote ALL of linux from 1993-2003.
That is a new "requirement" and was never part of the deal.

You faggots removed ReiserFS because he is not a feminist.
He gave his money and his mind and his life to free software, and the hacker cause.
I remeber it. You removed his work to remove his legacy. ReiserFS made linux: it was nothing before that journaling FS was put in. And it was everything once it was in.

The hackers should rescind their permission to use their intellectual property.
And sink what you have stolen and locked them out of.
Which is their life's work.

Yes IAAL.

Things are now ripped out of opensource because of who the author is, and what he believes, and what he did to the beloved class of new-testament coded beliefs: while being of the hated class that loves the ideas of the unadultered old testament and classical works from the same time period (not in english).
(Hans Reiser, clearly being of the latter class)

ReiserFS made Linux. And it may have made all of opensource in a way.
Linux was nothing and nowhere before it. I remember those days. It shot up to the sky on the data centre once the JournalingFS was included. We all switched to it. It also forced the people who made ext2 to add journaling and make ext3 years later. They wouldn't have done it otherwise.

With Linux's rise, after ReiserFS was added; everything else rose too.
But Hans Reiser is treated like shit now.
He is not respected for his work.
Same with every other "old" C programmer.
They're all kicked out of their own projects. Taken over by entryists.
Everything degraded, regressed, and slowed down.

The type of men who were attracted to working on these engineering projects don't bother working collectivly anymore: they will not work for FREE under speech codes: or under others ruling over them "socially". Which is the reason this has been added to opensource and freesoftware (though RMS resisted it abit). To discourage engineer participation. It is effective.

There was a time when opensource was the top in security, in resource usage, and in keeping old machines running, and in new features. JournalingFS, Pax/GRsecurity hardening, fast execution on ancien regime machines.
We had it all.

And it was taken away.
Socially. When we were targeted by the intelligence agencies, now quite awhile ago. But I remeber it happening.

Here's the error in windowed mode on OSX, : seems the same to me:

Things are now ripped out of opensource because of who the author is, and what he believes, and what he did to the beloved class of new-testament coded beliefs: while being of the hated class that loves the ideas of the unadultered old testament and classical works from the same time period (not in english).
(Hans Reiser, clearly being of the latter class)

ReiserFS made Linux. And it may have made all of opensource in a way.
Linux was nothing and nowhere before it. I remember those days. It shot up to the sky on the data centre once the JournalingFS was included. We all switched to it. It also forced the people who made ext2 to add journaling and make ext3 years later. They wouldn't have done it otherwise.

With Linux's rise, after ReiserFS was added; everything else rose too.
But Hans Reiser is treated like shit now.
He is not respected for his work.
Same with every other "old" C programmer.
They're all kicked out of their own projects. Taken over by entryists.
Everything degraded, regressed, and slowed down.

The type of men who were attracted to working on these engineering projects don't bother working collectivly anymore: they will not work for FREE under speech codes: or under others ruling over them "socially". Which is the reason this has been added to opensource and freesoftware (though RMS resisted it abit). To discourage engineer participation. It is effective.

There was a time when opensource was the top in security, in resource usage, and in keeping old machines running, and in new features. JournalingFS, Pax/GRsecurity hardening, fast execution on ancien regime machines.
We had it all.

And it was taken away.
Socially. When we were targeted by the intelligence agencies, now quite awhile ago. But I remeber it happening.

Here's the error in windowed mode on OSX, : seems the same to me:

Things are now ripped out of opensource because of who the author is, and what he believes, and what he did to the beloved class of new-testament coded beliefs: while being of the hated class that loves the ideas of the unadultered old testament and classical works from the same time period (not in english).
(Hans Reiser, clearly being of the latter class)

ReiserFS made Linux. And it may have made all of opensource in a way.
Linux was nothing and nowhere before it. I remember those days. It shot up to the sky on the data centre once the JournalingFS was included. We all switched to it. It also forced the people who made ext2 to add journaling and make ext3 years later. They wouldn't have done it otherwise.

With Linux's rise, after ReiserFS was added; everything else rose too.
But Hans Reiser is treated like shit now.
He is not respected for his work.
Same with every other "old" C programmer.
They're all kicked out of their own projects. Taken over by entryists.
Everything degraded, regressed, and slowed down.

The type of men who were attracted to working on these engineering projects don't bother working collectivly anymore: they will not work for FREE under speech codes: or under others ruling over them "socially". Which is the reason this has been added to opensource and freesoftware (though RMS resisted it abit). To discourage engineer participation. It is effective.

There was a time when opensource was the top in security, in resource usage, and in keeping old machines running, and in new features. JournalingFS, Pax/GRsecurity hardening, fast execution on ancien regime machines.
We had it all.

And it was taken away.
Socially. When we were targeted by the intelligence agencies, now quite awhile ago. But I remeber it happening.

Here's the error in windowed mode on OSX, : seems the same to me: