>>17931191

>and other arguments I could use against an atheist about the necessity of God to exist, send revelation, etc
And you could use those to prove the Koran, specifically? Please show the class, anon.

>He decided this to be creation and that's that.
So then you agree he wasn't bound by the laws of logic to not make the possible world where you cut off your hand five minutes ago. Meaning that the world where you cut off your hand five minutes ago is, in fact, a possible world. But one which will never be actualized.

Hence, there can indeed be possible worlds which will never be actualized.

>I reject your interpretation of what you think it means
All I think "I am in the Father" means is that he is in the Father. What is there to reject?

>I used the absurdity of you yourself being God
Oof still stuck on this script. You ever see that Marco Rubio debate? Now I know what it must have been like to be there live.

>You can't leave then return to someone that you are always in.
When Surah al-Imran is incarnate, will it cease to also be in the mind of Allah?

>you cannot even tell the difference between a part and an attribute
Would you care to elaborate?