>>713644921
Hmmm, too bad the example posted here >>713633987 basically shows most of the "censored" pics in the next frame and you can get a good idea of what the others show. It would only be cp to actual pedophiles, it doesn't show genitalia and wouldn't be considered sexual situations to anyone who is not a pedophile. It would be like complaining that pics of kids at the beach is cp because they are in swimsuits.