>>513214655
>Just because Suriyak says it doesn't mean anything.
>>513214753
>That's not evidence, anon.
Oh yeah I'm not saying Suriyak is 100% accurate always. I personally do think he tends to show reverses against Russia a bit too quickly. But imo he's more accurate than not. Fwiw divgen, who I think is best, maintains picrel but I wouldn't be surprised if he "adjusts the LBS" tomorrow.