>>534001519
The line between baiting and retardation is non existence these days. I'd rather reply cause I enjoy talking to retards, even if it's potentially false.

Rolled 2 (1d2)

>1. Make appointment with leading bureaucrats for tomorrow.
>2. Don't make the appointment with the bureaucrats.

>>6252315
While she might have a simple heart and mindset, Bertha ain't no dummy. Though her INT can take a nose-dive every once in a while.
If you guys want any of the wives to get smarter you could always have her read some of Ruby's books, get a tutor for her, or just send her to the Academy.

>>6252514
Arcanum loosely inspired how I wrote gnomes here lmao

The existing /jp/ thread was last posted in in 2014 so I think that it could be time for a new one.

Just to throw it out there at the very beginning: from a moderation perspective, /jp/ is doing just fine. Everybody is very happy in /jp/. The absolutely disruptive idiots have gone away which basically singlehandedly makes /jp/ far more manageable than the dumpster fire it was for some years of its existence.

However, as a user, there are parts of it that I'm not entirely happy with. /jp/ has the peculiar pathology it's difficult to discuss anywhere because the designated zone /qa/ seems to house all of /jp/'s ban evaders over the last five years and makes having a conversation about it impossible. So I was hoping to use this thread to discuss some of the issues that I think affect /jp/ as a board in general.