>>513723359
I normally do not post anything regarding Laney's propaganda, but this is just such a comically stupid strawman cartoon. Not only is she comparing apples to oranges, she's probably doing it being fully aware of it, because she has no argument.
First of all, her argument is just the good old appeal to nature fallacy. Just because rape is natural (dolphins do it as well) doesn't mean it's good.
Second: women remove their body hair. And they did it throughout history. They did it in ancient Egypt with beeswax, during the middle ages, in ancient Greek societies. So no, it's not a "modern invention" forced upon women by the "patriarchy". Women should shave their legs. Being hairy is associated with ageing, and because we're biological creatures, we fucking despise ageing (in women), because old women are infertile. A man's beard however makes him more attractive, because it shows maturity and masculinity (the ability to grow thick facial hair).
Is it possible to comment directly on her channel or whatever she's using? Anyone got a link?