>>28619084
>the soft rear end and hard front end means the drive can mang on the throttle and really throw the car into turns but as a consequence it's not very responsive or precise.
Hmm I was wondering why the rear ARB was softer on this stratos. Doesn't feel unresponsive though, but then again, it's a stratos.
>You can further manipulate the specific way the weight distribution is controlled by setting different balances of ARB stiffness between front and rear, which can drastically change the way the car behaves in turning.
hmmmmmm
>>28619121
>by controlling roll you control what is called static camber.
wouldn't it be "active" camber, since it happens only during cornering? Static, I would image would be toe and chamber that is there even when the car is stopped?
>both of these settings control the effective thrust angle of the wheel and tire. if you have lots of negative camber you need to have lots of negative toe (wheels pointed outwards) so that the cambered wheel still rolls forward in a straight line.
ah makes sense
> fronts are just barely cambered enough so that even when in an extreme like that the outside tire is flat on the ground.
why don't they have less ARB to have the inside tire touch the ground as well?
Is having just good contact with only the outside tire enough?

Anyway a webm that is semi related. (tires being lifted)