>>513103583
>Buckeye Bungalow
nice

Some oldish, but still goodish, news
>In the majority opinion, Judge Julius Richardson, joined by Judge G. Steven Agee, concluded that the executive order did not violate the Privacy Act. “The Privacy Act does not prohibit sharing information with those whose jobs give them good reason to access it,” Judge Richardson said.
>The pair argued that DOGE’s role was comparable to “a consultant needing to survey systems for improvements.” The opinion also questioned whether the plaintiffs had proper legal standing, noting that they failed to show “that their specific records had been accessed.

Of course, Slick Willy's appointee had some 'misgivings'
>”However, the dissenting judge strongly disagreed. In his opinion, Judge Robert King—a Bill Clinton appointee—claimed that the executive order effectively granted “unfettered, unprecedented, and apparently unnecessary access” to sensitive information.