>>28565255
Bold to assume I'd be upset about people disregarding proven machines. I'm more infuriated that consumers shill gimmicks that effectively shoot themselves in the foot especially long term sustainability.
All you are doing is making it even cheaper for me to buy the baller bikes.
>>28565252
Asking the same question? Guess you ran out of ammo.
>I'd rather be conflated as a wise unc' than be interpreted as a young sucka
>mfw the gimmick enjoying bugmen are the reason all the cool older bikes are getting cheaper by the day