I've been giving this case some thought. Some highlights:
>A former county clerk in Kentucky who was briefly jailed for refusing to issue same-sex marriage licenses on religious grounds is asking the Supreme Court to consider her appeal, arguing in part that the high court’s landmark 2015 decision recognizing gay marriage rights was wrongly decided.
>In her appeal, Davis, supported by the religious advocacy group Liberty Counsel, argued the First Amendment’s free exercise protections should shield her from liability, and that the Supreme Court’s 2015 same-sex marriage decision in Obergefell v. Hodges is based on a “legal fiction.”
>The appeal, which quotes heavily from two current Justices who dissented to the gay marriage ruling at the time — Clarence Thomas and Chief Justice John Roberts — also asks the high court to go after an even deeper set of legal standards known as substantive due process.
>Under this concept, courts have found that the due process protections of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments create rights not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution to privacy, interracial marriage, same-sex marriage, and, until the 2022 decision overturning Roe v .Wade, abortion.

So, I think this boat might actually float due to the 'substantive due process' bs. It allowed for the ridiculous federal abortion policy to end and, as we know, the courts love their precedents. Third (I'm going to get hate here, but fuck it), I don't think that she .. her personal actions here .. have any weight. She denied married rights to people under laws that exist and it was her job to follow through.

I do respect a person's right to their beliefs but this is akin to denying someone a driver's license because they think that driving is a sin. You don't get to impress your personal views on everyone around you just because you feel righteous.

What I mean is that gay marriage might be ended but that I think that her personal case has no weight and she is culpable.