>>283174392
Reminder that your "argument" is spamming buzzwords and off topic screencaps, bro.
>backtracking
Nope, nice try. You said if the author was involved *at all*. You're just upset I dismantled your logic here now.
>official
There's tons of official, non-canon media, adaptations being just that. The only canon is the source material.
>My argument is that the original author being present makes the work not a fanfiction. You are the only one mentioning canon.
Newsflash retardbro, "not a fanfiction" is synonymous with "canon". I'm glad to see you're now flip flopping between two points as this progresses, a classic motte and bailey isn't seen every day.
And, once more, an adaptation IS fanfiction if it is not 1:1. This is not arguable. If it is not faithful to the source material, it is not canon. My hatred of the manga stems from it being unfaithful fanfiction, not for simply existing, don't get it twisted.