>>516093183
>I do indeed believe that those post-wall women have power.
>The (((handlers))) above them only order the direction to go, while the roasties decide how to do it. If they fuck up, you put another post-wall women there.
That is at least partially true.
By being the executor, the one who has to sign the papers and enacts the policy, there is ofc some freedom of movement simply due to that fact and that replacement takes a while.
If you also have some skills and connection, like Hillary and Nuland have, there is occasionally some middle ground where you can have enough of the elites supporting your side venture and have your back.
But then we have the airheads like Sanna Marin, Von Der Leyen, 360 Baerbock etc who have no ideas at all.
Theoretically they as you point out have some power, but they were selected to their positions because they lacked any agenda of their own.
>I think the (((handlers))) noticed that emotion driven old women are the best shabbos goys when you want to send young men to die. A correct assessment.
Correct
>>516093581
>i wonder if the numbers are wrong though, probably not
There is some western trickery to lower the number, like "privatizing" mandatory services usually handled by the state (like health insurance in the US and that entire scam).

But the general picture is always the same, here is taxes as share of GDP (IIRC the us also runs a 10% deficit on top of this, so in reality the government size as share of the economy should be larger than shown)

The only thing China has that is "communist" is the cultural ideals and purpose while taxed more like a capitalist state.
The people and state work to prosper together.
Meanwhile the west is increasingly individualist/capitalist culturally, but taxed more like communism.

It would be entertaining if I didn't live in it.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/historical-gov-spending-gdp?tab=line&country=USA~DEU~CHN~RUS