>>82843452
I have extreme levels of respect for people who can unironically do meditation to the point monks can. I could never, no matter how much I tried.
Like some of these dudes are able to meditate in such an extreme manner, like this dude who self-immolated in protest, and literally did not move or speak while burning alive.
How the fuck can someone even achieve that level of mindset where even when you're feeling the worst pain you could literally ever feel, yet remain calm during it?

Video: Buddist monk, self-immolation by fire ->
https://web.archive.org/web/20250921020403/https://ipfs.asycn.io/ipfs/bafybeibfmlpk6h2iq47sct54ix7bt3i2rh73pugq6dvkg7unwiwwjwv7si/1570363930511.mp4

I have ~three other Buddhism-related image... Unrelated: can someone explain this YouTube video, i don't get the joke ->
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--IXh4o4L-8

>>514969190
>>514969350
>>514969545
>>514971372
>>514972789
Robots
https://youtube.com/shorts/b_r-VB_J0hk?feature=share
>trash superpowa

>>514803856
Simple
https://youtube.com/shorts/PMOm1PVNlos?feature=share

New angle no one has seen

https://youtube.com/shorts/PMOm1PVNlos?si=8Bxoo76imMidNDo4

Anyone baking?

Is this photo famous and considered great because of the subject, the composition, or the camera?

If it's because of the subject, does the composition or camera matter?

If it's the composition, what makes it such a great composition?

If it's the camera, can you name it and why the camera used for this photo was uniquely capable of taking this photo? Can you name the film used and the settings used to take the photo?