And while on the topic of the lady of shalott, if you like those, >>96397294, take a look at his fully-chromolithographed version of the lady of shalott (which >>96381451 is from). You can find the whole thing online here: https://archive.org/details/the-lady-of-shalott/page/n17/mode/2up

My own 1st edition of it is all kinds fucked up (pic related), but the scans don't quite do it justice.