>>76805810
>>76805827
This post was most definitely written by a woman, or a very young, naïve and fervent religious man
I am religious too, very devout and go to Church weekly, but I am also no fool on the nature of women. Do you sincerely think, given that you are not a woman yourself, that women are equal to men, and able to take accountability for their own shortcoming instead of blaming everyone and everything else?
Let me explain something elemental to you. Men are biologically hard-wired to take responsibility. We are made to develop competence and abilities through competition, by way of play, and to then take charge when we are the most competent and capable people around. If something goes wrong, that's on us. The buck stops with us, so we better make damn sure things go well. Almost every single culture that has ever existed on the face of the Earth has had initiation rituals to test how far along his development a boy was, and to declare him a man if he was competent enough.
Women are not so. They become women through 0 effort of their own. They do not compete, at least not directly. They do not work hard to make the transition from girls to women. Nature hands it to them for free. Their task is to decide how to spend their capital, not to build it up. This is why the essence of femininity is liberal. I digress.
Because the process of adulthood is a passive, non-involved process, women's mentality reflects this. They are biologically hard-wired to reject accountability and responsibility. They reject duty. They can barely handle being loyal. They can barely handle not stuffing their face with garbage 24/7 and ballooning up to morbid obesity. They are like little children mentally.
Now this has been understood for millennia by men, and this would be all fine and dandy if we didn't live in a gynocentric society that hoists women to the same unearned and unnatural status of equality with men.