>>40860524
>I'll just leave this shitty, AI larp here
this. reads like a dusty, old science textbook. this doesn't sound like a whistleblower freaking out. plus, OP, you can't censor every astronomer globally, genius. an intelligence disturbance of that magnitude couldn't be hidden from public observation. hell, even some faggot ham radio-style, amateur telescopefag on youtube with only 23 views per video could've picked up such a repeater transmission. fuck, i miss the good ole days of real shit hackers and leakers like gary mckinnon