>>64339210
Personally I would just put the funds into an Arsenal 106, or find a Saiga that is converted or needs converting, or a SAR-3

>>64339418
>i don't think you are either
You're right, I'm not, but I'm also not making any quantitative claims about WBP vs PSA vs IO Inc vs Riley, vs Pioneer etc failure rate. I'm just talking about manufacturing processes and metallurgy.
I will claim the failure rate for all these shit AKs is significantly higher though than what we hear of or see from real AK manufacturers, or real kit builds done by good builders.

>>64339119
What a dumb fucking post

>>64339183
Real bake mag? I don't like Midwest Industries. Cool build otherwise.