>>719190963
>And does what with that definition, exactly?
Defines it as "obscenity" which is banned under current US law.
>Well, I'm sold. I now fully support what (you allege) they're doing.
Yeah, this would be why you've been losing constantly for the past 60 years. Just kneecap one of the few media centers that still openly cater to straight males as an audience in favor of... what? Hollywood? Capeshit comics? It's hard to not think you're a literal asset when you spout off coal like this.