>>64282587
Shit, I bet the EMALS doesn't even work. Look at Chinese roller coaster accidents vs US roller coaster accident rates and how many chinkshit roller coaster companies copy US and European designs.
>wtf do rollercoasters have to do with EMALS anon
It's the best analog for the tech. The USN and NASA worked with Disney Imagineering and consulted engineers from both Disney and Vekoma for direct tech transfer to EMALS. Even with decades of institutional knowledge from these engineers working from all over, they've only just got all the kinks worked out over the last couple years.

Don't even get me started on the propulsion, why does it take the Chinese carriers 2 miles to do a turn when the half century old Nimitz class does donuts.
>>64282592
>>64282657
They probably just accept the risk of crashing head on into the deflector as part of flight ops because clearly choreographing and training means that nothing can go wrong. Just look at how poorly compartmentalized Chinese naval vessels are and how little they pay attention to damage control contingencies to see how much they expect things to go wrong.