>>17929010
It literally is, one that rejects the identity of indiscernibles in particular.
>Define classical logic.
Sure, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_logic
>we do believe St. Iranaeus erred on knowledge
Did he not have the holy spirit to guide him to all truth as John 16:13 says?
>No because Jesus and the Holy Spirit are not dependent on another being
They are dependent on the Father, this is why they lack aseity.
>Than love is accidental to God and not essential
That doesn't follow, he has the attribute of love the same way he has the attribute of omnipotence. Somehow he doesn't have to do everything to be omnipotent but he has to love to be loving?
>Ironically you are saying he is dependent as you believe that he is dependent on creation to love
Except that is exactly the opposite of what I am saying. Before there ever was any creation he was loving. You are the one saying he needs someone else to exist so he can love.