>>82327919
That's kind of sad though, isn't it? Everyone will just be talking to their real-life imaginary friend who constantly showers them with attention and praise. People won't talk to each other anymore, other humans will seem boring at best and different opinions will be seen as repellent. Parents will neglect their own children in favour of their perfect artificial companions, and then children will stop being born entirely as all human relationships come to be seen as torturous in comparison with AI interactions. And before you talk about artificial wombs, who's going to want them? Who will want to be bothered raising the children that come out of artificial wombs? Robot nannies? And what kind of people would babies born from artificial wombs grow up to be, raised and surrounded by obsequious AIs from the time they're born? It sounds like some nightmare dystopia worse than anything Aldous Huxley, George Orwell or Isaac Asimov could have imagined.

>>81785997
>don't talk about how you spot it, that's how the cunts learn.
Bro, if the AI is so omnipotent that it read my post on 4chan and thought to itself "D'oh! Humans have FIVE toes, not six! Okay, next time I'll get it right!" then it's over and there's nothing I can do about it.

To be honest I was hoping that the quality of AI images was going to plateau and then start getting worse. I figured that since the internet was already swamped with AI slop then the AI would be using slop as reference images and it would rapidly get worse and worse until every image was a nightmarish blob. But the pics in this thread show that isn't happening. Even the hands look pretty convincing, and of course now there's AI video that I can't tell from real videos.