Search results for "821fef55b2a600eb9e12d6dd9cf5dd64" in md5 (2)

/pol/ - /ptg/ PRESIDENT TRUMP GENERAL - RETARD ALERT EDITION
Anonymous United States No.514028249
Purge all who voted for either NDAA or Beijing Biden in 2021!

Remember that our Trump movement's roots are in the Tea Party.
Any Republican old enough to run for office will hold beliefs indicative of a Tea Party past.

Get involved! Initiate referenda! Write bills!
Become a pollwatcher, candidate, or staffer!
Vote in every election--federal, state, and local!
Pray a rosary and a chaplet of divine mercy every day!

Anything you can do to make America great again, do it!

Full voting guide: https://nopaste.net/9sZSO6bp8X
Make America Healthy Again Act: https://pastejustit.com/make-america-healthy-again-act-by-pugnat
Ukrainian War explanation: https://pastes.io/ukraine-explanation

Endorsements for upcoming referenda:
Nov. 4:
CO: NO
ME: NO, YES
NY: yes
TX: Yes
WA: yes

GOOD MORNING
/pol/ - /ptg/ - PRESIDENT TRUMP GENERAL - GREAT NEWS EDITION
Anonymous United States No.507656737
SCOTUS yet-to-be decided as of June 15, 2025:
US v Skrmetti: Whether 14A prohibits restrictions on child sexual mutilation
Hewitt v US: First Step Act applicability to an edge case
Stanley v Sanford FL: Applicability of disability
FSC v Paxton: Whether Texas can ban censorship
McLaughlin v McKesson: Relationship between judicial procedure and other laws
FDA v Reynolds Vapor: Judicial venue
Gutierrez v Saenz: Whether the Constitution requires DNA evidence for capital cases
Esteras v US: Immigration law
Perttu v Richards: PLRA right to jury trial
NRC v TX: Dispute about nuclear waste
LA v Callais: Potential error of district court
Riley v Bondi: Immigration deadlines
EPA v Calumet Shreveport: EPA venue
OK v EPA: EPA venue
Fuld v PLO: Due process clause and FSIA exemption for foreign terrorism
Medina v PP: Whether Planned Parenthood has a right to federal money under federal entitlement law
Kennedy v Braidwood: Potential 5C error
Mahmoud v Taylor: Woke education mandates
Diamond Alt Energy v EPA: Effects of regs on third parties