>>725107346
>>725109080
I'm gleefully anticipating the usual shitstorm of paranoid bluesky impression junkies dabbing on each other with unsubstantiated claims that ACSHUALLY THEY DID USE AI LOOK AT THIS WONKY HAND REVOKE THE REWARD NOW NOW NOW!!! btw please buy my low effort renpy 'game' about depression and donate me a kofi and subscribe to my patreon and wow this post really blew up here's a sponsored post about otter-themed packers for FtMs
4chan Search
3 results for "8250d12f91d9ef1dcf3731fc2f5f513c"
>>723555441
Here’s why it can be an issue:
Transparency and authenticity:
If you post AI-generated arguments on a site like 4chan without disclosing that they’re from an AI, it can mislead people about who’s participating in the discussion. That kind of deception can contribute to misinformation or manipulation — even if that’s not your intent.
Amplification and influence:
AI can produce persuasive, high-volume content quickly. On platforms known for anonymity and volatile discourse, that can easily distort conversations or spread ideas without genuine human accountability.
Responsibility:
You’re ultimately responsible for anything posted under your name or IP, even if an AI helped write it. If the AI generates something inflammatory, illegal, or harmful, you would be accountable for it.
Rules:
Many sites including 4chan and similar forums have policies or community norms against spam, manipulation, or automated posting. Using AI-generated material can violate those rules.
Here’s why it can be an issue:
Transparency and authenticity:
If you post AI-generated arguments on a site like 4chan without disclosing that they’re from an AI, it can mislead people about who’s participating in the discussion. That kind of deception can contribute to misinformation or manipulation — even if that’s not your intent.
Amplification and influence:
AI can produce persuasive, high-volume content quickly. On platforms known for anonymity and volatile discourse, that can easily distort conversations or spread ideas without genuine human accountability.
Responsibility:
You’re ultimately responsible for anything posted under your name or IP, even if an AI helped write it. If the AI generates something inflammatory, illegal, or harmful, you would be accountable for it.
Rules:
Many sites including 4chan and similar forums have policies or community norms against spam, manipulation, or automated posting. Using AI-generated material can violate those rules.
>>723267312
Because these things are basically reddit atheists throwing their toys out the pram because mommy and daddy said they have to do chores and not spend all day on the computer.
The idea of doing chores and having responsibilities inspires a juvenile rebellious spite in (wo)manchildren. Be it washing the dishes/going to church, or be it raising children and being a boring functional adult, the mentally stunted are driven into a fit of nihilistic rage at the mere thought that they can't eternally have their cake and eat it forever.
They can and will throw a fit even if "Chad" picks them, provided they're expected to behave like a civilised adult with responsibilities. Surely you've heard stories about women hating their rich good looking partners and self-destructing both their lives, even murdering their own children, because he wouldn't hire a nanny or take her on vacations without the kid. Womanchildren can't be fixed with good dick and money, they'll resent you and your kids if they realise what you provide them comes with conditions and responsibilities instead of you being a freely exploitable resource for money, pleasure, and ego boosting.
That's why chad doesn't want people like that, he knows better, and that drives "femcels" to a bitter, spiteful, and lonely end much like their fat male feminist reddit atheist counterparts.
Because these things are basically reddit atheists throwing their toys out the pram because mommy and daddy said they have to do chores and not spend all day on the computer.
The idea of doing chores and having responsibilities inspires a juvenile rebellious spite in (wo)manchildren. Be it washing the dishes/going to church, or be it raising children and being a boring functional adult, the mentally stunted are driven into a fit of nihilistic rage at the mere thought that they can't eternally have their cake and eat it forever.
They can and will throw a fit even if "Chad" picks them, provided they're expected to behave like a civilised adult with responsibilities. Surely you've heard stories about women hating their rich good looking partners and self-destructing both their lives, even murdering their own children, because he wouldn't hire a nanny or take her on vacations without the kid. Womanchildren can't be fixed with good dick and money, they'll resent you and your kids if they realise what you provide them comes with conditions and responsibilities instead of you being a freely exploitable resource for money, pleasure, and ego boosting.
That's why chad doesn't want people like that, he knows better, and that drives "femcels" to a bitter, spiteful, and lonely end much like their fat male feminist reddit atheist counterparts.