>>510765288
>AI's have been lobotomized so they don't admit jews should be blamed for everything
therefore don't get mad at that fact?

and yeah nigger, i know i can swap out "jew" for something else, but every time i've seen one of you "clever" people swap in words like that it's just using leading questions, and this topic isn't going to go very far without giving it those names and how am i supposed to get back to jews? say vague, leading questions like "if they were all in the same family would that be suspicious".

i mean... you should have read between the lines here.
>you idiot child
no u

>>2801090
>a lot still seem to be plenty broke to me
no. every single person is rich and this is a possible thing to happen because we live in lala land.

>Grab delivery, trike rides, or do construction for < $10 per day or even work in a hotel front desk for that much
are you able to fucking read? i'm talking about filipinas (not the male only jobs you mentioned, but you're still wrong because YES those people are part of rich families) and if you know anything about women, they don't share their wealth unless pressured to, so the men aren't always getting a free ride, nor are they part of whatever harem the girls are glomming onto or just living in their own apartment now, as per typical divide and conquer tactics that make people easy targets.

your statements are predicated on a common fallacy i've seen americans make where "if you have money you don't work, and therefore never have to work and couldn't become poor". i have plenty of money and still work a full time job. i also own a business and have shitloads of investments that make me richer than 99% of people in my demographic....... it's only in poor people's heads that rich people don't work at jobs, at least from every example from which i've observed this fallacy