>>23144391
The Torah was not ancient law from Moses but a late Hellenistic creation, first in Greek and then dressed in archaic Hebrew. No pre–3rd century BCE evidence shows it existed in manuscripts, inscriptions, or foreign records, and no one practiced the religion it describes until the Hasmonean period. Its prophecies were written after the fact, turning history into proof of divine plan. The archaic language is imitation, not survival. This means the Torah is political invention, not timeless revelation, a shift that shakes the foundations of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.
The Pharisee are the Edomites (descendent of Amalek which the Israelites were told to genocide and which descent from the Canaanites which worshipped Moloch and such) which previously were forced to convert. However they really liked their old customs which were unlawful and thus they created the Oral Law. You know how in Court a Jew will use semantics, grey areas, loopholes and other pilpul to argue they didnt break a law which they never followed completly ignoring the intent behind the law? The Oral Law of the Pharisee is a guideline on how to do that with the OT Law.
Before Judaism there was Semitic polytheism. Judaism doesn't come into being until the Persians in the 5th century BC, and even then it was a kind of unstable hybrid of Zoroastrianism and Semitic polytheism. With the Greeks it takes on a more familiar shape. Then they produced their ‘history’ and holy books, and invented themselves.
Both say they’re the real continuation of Israel’s faith. Historically they’re siblings, split from the same Second Temple Judaism. You can’t flip it and say Judaism came from Christianity.