>>938608977
So I assume the accumulated data like this here is just made up. Then how do you identify data, you find trustworthy?
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-covid-19-deaths-by-vaccination-status

I'm gonna make an assumption here and claim that you only trust data that aligns with your previously existing ideas, because the possibility of you being wrong would cause you to have to ask yourself serious and very uncomfortable questions about the time and effort you poured into this.

Your fallacy is called "The Texas sharpshooter": https://priorprobability.com/2019/03/31/cherry-picking/