>>11366461
>6. educated women as gender traitors... As soon as there is no longer a need, they're discarded
The rare woman who actually materially benefits from an education would just be a somewhat higher value mother. Education exists for women, but it mostly exist to equip her with the tools to fulfill her role in society. So they make sure she's literate- what she's reading is just propaganda to reinforce her place anyways- and they make sure she's capable of vocational math. But where a high school boy might be learning calculus and physics, she's going to home economics. Outside of that education would only exist to make a woman a more valuable prize for a man who is likewise academically inclined.
>>11366415
>It's not really about politics, it's just that it's been so clear to me for so long that feminism makes no sense for our species on a biological level.
Feminism may have started to advance the plight of low value women but it became the plaything of wealthy bored ones. I don't know about seeing a rollback of women's rights but on a social level women are going to start pushing women back into conventional life roles. The few women actively benefitting from feminism don't justify the misery of the rest.