>>16841338
Yes, but also no, I used grok to help translate the math into 4chan suitable latex format because you complained about it, that's it. The math existed much before this conversation.

The magnetic vector potential is not a bivector; it is a polar vector quantity defined such that its curl equals the magnetic field.
>dunce cap confirmed

Also, Jesus Christ... you need to actually LOOK at the archived thread because our definitions of chi are completely different and you haven't even realized that because of your lack of diligence.

>>16841340
More irony that comes off as idiocy, never gets old, always gets noticed.