>>546430647
>>546431074
>>546431272
>>546431331
>>546431514
Here is what happened last month (showing 90th club since it makes a difference of all of 200k from that to 100th).
If you didn’t get 67million fans in an S-club in October you were carried. /Uma/ Club would rather you get the minimum of S so that the members that want to push for S+ can carry there instead of asking for a firm 60 or whatever and having the carriers be what makes or breaks S-rank.
The club IS going for S+. That doesn’t mean anyone making at least the 90th or 100th average will be kicked. Nor does it mean that we are going to recruit as “looking for S+ trainers”. The anon that said “both are true” is correct, go for the top, ask for the minimum to get there. If you are doing S-rank numbers anyway you’re probably flexible enough to add or leave 7mil or whatever ends up being the case (And if the bottom drops to 50 or 40 that will be the case with the minimum asked for too)
(We also use a group average of 20-days as a fallback in case there’s some crazy difficult month where getting S is too much trouble)