>>725468489
>they were in pre-production at the very least, as tech being demoed for it was shown off in bits and pieces
All of the preproduction for TES6 is either engine enhancements that were already implemented in Starfield or conceptual documentation. We know how their development pipeline works, none of their asset artists would have been working on TES6 until most of the work was completed on Starfield and the bulk of the team did not transition over until the first year of Starfield post-launch content wrapped up.
>starfield got barraged by criticism from all parties, so whatever they were hoping to learn from that mess probably didn't pan out how they preferred
The lesson I learned and what I hoped Bethesda learned is that casuals just fucking hate space games. Most of the stated criticisms were addressed in Shattered Space and people just hated that even more. And then Oblivion Remastered comes out with an overworld that feels more procedurally generated than a Starfield planet and people love it. What am I supposed to take away from that?

Well what I see and I hope Bethesda sees is that RPG players are fantasy plebs and if you're going to make a space game, you pretty much have to design it for the space engineer nerds. They tried to casualize the survival sim elements down for a broader RPG audience that was never going to be interested in the game in the first place. My guess is the next Starfield DLC pivots hard towards content centered around spaceships.

>>714454134
Original frogposter here. OP posted two movies implying the kind of content he would like to see from games. One is a good movie with a sexy character. The other is a shit movie with a sexy character. The only conceivable takeaway is that the OP has literally no regard for quality and just wants to coom to hot women which is pathetic.