>>40608455
Why are Freemasons systematically absent from public debate, even though they are everywhere behind the scenes?
Politics, justice, police, finance, media, medicine, culture: they are still lodges, networks, "discreet" fraternities. They are said to have "no real power"... and yet, they are always where decisions are made.
Why has a group of men in aprons, who meet in secret, with esoteric rituals, continued to exist at a high level for centuries?
We are talking here about an initiatory network based on oaths of silence, occult symbols, and hierarchical ranks, like an IRL MMORPG.
>They call themselves "brothers," they have titles, rites of passage, and "humanist" values... but only among themselves.
And you want to tell me they're just there to "improve themselves"? Do you believe that?
Why can't a Freemason ever betray another Freemason, even if he's acting illegally?
Why are magistrates, police officers, senior civil servants, and MPs all in the same fraternity, but never speak about it publicly?
Why is their existence officially recognized, but their influence is always minimized?
>If you talk about it, you're a conspiracy theorist.
>If you're part of it, you shut your mouth.
>And if you try to expose them, you're considered crazy.
